Farmers Advocate Office put on hold

Must Read

Smoky Skies Bulletin issued Friday for Peace River South

FORT ST. JOHN, B.C. - Environment Canada has issued another Smoky Skies Bulletin for Peace River South. According to Environment...

Three new cases of COVID-19 identified in Northern Health Region

VICTORIA, B.C. – Three new cases of COVID-19 were confirmed on Friday, bringing the total in the Northern Health...

Economic recovery plan has “next to nothing” for British Columbians, says Wilkinson

FORT ST. JOHN, B.C. - The Provincial Government released its COVID-19 economic recovery plan on Thursday, and B.C. Liberal...


Photo: Director Arthur Hadland discusses the Farmers Advocate Office at the PRRD meeting on Thursday – Christine Rumleskie/Energeticcity.ca

 

By Christine Rumleskie

- Advertisement -

 

If they haven’t already, landowners in the Peace Region should stop holding their breath for a Farmers Advocate office.

The news comes on the heels of a heated debate at the Peace River Regional District meeting on Thursday.

Two consulting firms had been candidates to operate the Farmers Advocate Office, for a trial period of 18 months. The South Peace office would have cost the PRRD $240,000, half of which would have been provided by the province.

Naturally, PRRD Director Mike Bernier is in favor of the location.

[asset|aid=2631|format=mp3player|formatter=asset_bonus|title=05fb23adda20e2a71bafcfb7cf8660f1-Bernier – advocate 1_1_Pub.mp3]

The Farmers Advocate Office is now eight years in the making, and is supposed to be a resource for property owners in the Peace. For instance, if a landowner has a concern about oil and gas companies operating on their property, the Advocate Office would give the landowner the tools and information needed to address the problem.

Director Arthur Hadland says while there’s still room for improvement on the proposal, the Advocate Office is much needed, especially in the South Peace.

[asset|aid=2632|format=mp3player|formatter=asset_bonus|title=05fb23adda20e2a71bafcfb7cf8660f1-Hadland – advocate 1_1_Pub.mp3]

But the issue that concerned many directors was a potential conflict of interest. One company that applied to operate the Advocate Office does consultation work involving oil and gas companies.

Advertisement


The board tabled the motion, and later had the companies confirm that they would continue their outbound work, all while running the independent office.

That decision swayed most directors to defeat the motion on the table, and come back with another plan of action. Directors Hadland, Mike Bernier and Lyman Clarke were the only directors that voted in favor of the motion.

- Advertisement -

Community Interviews with Moose FM


Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news delivered to your mailbox every morning.

More Articles Like This